The University Times

In light of recent criticisms of institutional inequality, Trinity should work to improve on its recent success.

With €16 million in funding given to posts being hired under the model, it looks like Trinity may not have engaged with the arguments in its consultation process.

Recent developments indicate a prioritisation of students’ best interests above finances.

Traditionally students are poor at engaging with consultation, but this would mean we miss a huge opportunity.

For students, WiFi is as important as the books on the shelves in Trinity’s libraries.

Trinity’s moral dilemma does not lie in its indirect investment in fossil fuels, but rather the opportunity cost of not making a statement from divesting.

The recent threat of strike organised by the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation (INMO) has been successful in stalling the decision of the HSE, but their demands must be met.

The HEA's Employment Control Framework creates a paradox for universities.

With the resignation of Prof Peter Coxon from the College Board, and with Prof Eoin O’Dell no longer Chair of the Fellows, the job of holding Trinity to account has only become harder.

If we have increased “political capital”, why was the only thing benefitting students a vague commitment to increase money to the student assistance fund?